Skip to content

Split compare view messages#3115

Merged
koesie10 merged 4 commits intomainfrom
koesie10/compare-messages
Dec 7, 2023
Merged

Split compare view messages#3115
koesie10 merged 4 commits intomainfrom
koesie10/compare-messages

Conversation

@koesie10
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@koesie10 koesie10 commented Dec 6, 2023

This splits up the compare view messages into 1 message for the query info and 1 message for the result set. To make this possible, the compare view now also caches the common result set names.

Checklist

  • CHANGELOG.md has been updated to incorporate all user visible changes made by this pull request.
  • Issues have been created for any UI or other user-facing changes made by this pull request.
  • [Maintainers only] If this pull request makes user-facing changes that require documentation changes, open a corresponding docs pull request in the github/codeql repo and add the ready-for-doc-review label there.

This splits the compare view messages into two different messages. One
contains the metadata that doesn't change when the user selects a
different result set, and the other contains the actual results.
This caches the common result set names and moves the common result set
names from the `SetComparisonsMessage` to the
`SetComparisonQueryInfoMessage`.
@koesie10 koesie10 marked this pull request as ready for review December 6, 2023 15:44
@koesie10 koesie10 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 6, 2023 15:44
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@charisk charisk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@koesie10 koesie10 enabled auto-merge December 7, 2023 09:40
@koesie10 koesie10 merged commit 789719a into main Dec 7, 2023
@koesie10 koesie10 deleted the koesie10/compare-messages branch December 7, 2023 09:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants